Dev loc

[FBlackBox]

服务调度上存在问题，不应该在app上直接使用BFakeLocationManagerService，应该通过BlackBoxCore去获取远程binder，此pr我先进行优化，等合并到master后再继续开发，感谢贡献。

[BlackBoxing]

Could you please explain the reason of method of invocation? I've looked up the leaking souce code of VA which just do it before I started to code fake location. But I thought it was a redundant work.

[FBlackBox]

This is not a redundant thing, because the process black manages the system service. If each process holds a BFakeLocationManagerService instead of getting the system service here, then the first point is that there is no consistency in the data, and there is no way for the developer to use the api to do some functions, such as developing a virtual joystick to simulate walking and moving when the application is running. The second point is that the LocationManager does not just store location information, but also needs to implement some system functions, such as callback information, simulating the real system to update the location function, etc.

[FBlackBox]

I will finish the subsequent development, please wait until I merge the code into master, you can check the code to understand the intent

[BlackBoxing]

Thanks for your rely. Yeah, I've realized the inconsistency in data before but ignored it when developing. Maybe I should take more time understanding base architecture of BB especially Binder work. Meanwhile, I've tried my best to avoid copying VA because I referred to VA part which is also similar to AOSP source code when coding. If there's any trouble or trace of plagiarism, please find me immediately.

[FBlackBox]

Yes, we try to write code according to our own ideas, although it may not be perfect enough as other already mature software, similar to VA, but we can improve it slowly.

[FBlackBox]

VA is a great piece of engineering, even though it does some ugly things. But it doesn't take away from the fact that it is a good project.

[BlackBoxing]

You're a magnificent partner. I guess you've looked up fake location thought I wrote there and done it partly.In the end, the simplified code looks well.

[BlackBoxing]

Have you fixed the bug of UI which couldn't get configuration of application from BLocationManager? I've seen the process is ideal.

[FBlackBox]

Have you fixed the bug of UI which couldn't get configuration of application from BLocationManager? I've seen the process is ideal.

yes

[BlackBoxing]

Have you fixed the bug of UI which couldn't get configuration of application from BLocationManager? I've seen the process is ideal.

yes

Could you tell me the reason? Is it the invocation of BLocationManagerService or the method of data persistence? The git record you submitted is messy which includes mine and yours. And do you use the email recently? Maybe I could email at you.

[FBlackBox]

It's a problem on kotlin, you used a non-null return value, but at first getLocation was null and kotlin threw the null pointer. Please check: https://github.com/FBlackBox/BlackBox/commit/c634779fc2a29e94924e3a78ae31bebe274b5e96, I've marked it for you.

[BlackBoxing]

It's a problem on kotlin, you used a non-null return value, but at first getLocation was null and kotlin threw the null pointer. Please check: c634779, I've marked it for you.

Thanks. I would check the code. Do you usually use email?