Closed JeromeMartinez closed 3 years ago
The updates look good to me.
I see that Jean updated the xml. I'll offer that once this PR is merged, I'll reply to Jean with directions on what edits to make to rfc9043.xml to correlate to this PR. Is any further discussion here needed though?
I merged this so we can move forward but maybe some of this text can be worded better, i think there are still 2 occurances of "coded" in there that would be better to be worded differently
Any proposal for a different term? The next step is for the 3 authors to okay rfc9043.xml after the captions are added, so it's really the last chance.
I hope i can stiill think clearly after all that terminology lawyering that cant be healthy. but i would say:
Definition of the state transition table for a get_rac
readout value of 0/1
I also notice that one_state is connexted to 0 and zero to 1, maybe thats correct but it just caught my eye
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9043 very close :)