5e aura

[rhagelstrom]

Added 5e aura type and cleaned up some of the aura faction stuff to not be so brittle. Motivation behind the 5e aura type to name a few is: https://www.dndbeyond.com/spells/spirit-guardians https://www.dndbeyond.com/spells/cloud-of-daggers https://www.dndbeyond.com/spells/cloudkill

Updated the readme if you want to read up on it a bit more

Tested but probably would be good to put on test for a while.

fixes #16

[bmos]

Very coo! I think the 5e nomenclature might be too specific though as this behavior is definitely present in 3.5e (and likely others).

[rhagelstrom]

I'm not tied to 5e aura type. I just couldn't think of anything better for a name.

Known conflict with b9 spell tokens. He is apparently notifying aura with a OOB_MSGTYPE_AURATOKENMOVE that tokens are moving that aren't actually moving. Probably need something for him to test against before notified

[rhagelstrom]

BCE Test Case; -5e Spirit Guardians (C); AURA: 15 !ally,5e; Spirit Guardians; IF: FACTION(notself); SAVEA: 15 WIS (M)(H); SAVES: 15 WIS (M)(H); SAVEDMG: 3d8 radiant

• 3.5 Spirit Guardians AURA: 15 !ally,5e; Spirit Guardians; IF: FACTION(notself); SAVEA: 15 WILL (M)(H); SAVES: 15 WILL (M)(H); SAVEDMG: 3d8 radiant

[bmos]

I'm not tied to 5e aura type. I just couldn't think of anything better for a name.

maybe: ,single or ,once.

[bmos]

Known conflict with b9 spell tokens. He is apparently notifying aura with a OOB_MSGTYPE_AURATOKENMOVE that tokens are moving that aren't actually moving. Probably need something for him to test against before notified

Just a conflict with your PR active, you mean? He could probably call Token.onMove.

[rhagelstrom]

I'll update the PR and go with single. Yes conflict with my PR. He is aware of it and it is 100% spell tokens ext. Nothing I can do about it if data getting sent to me isn't correct.

[rhagelstrom]

@bmos Should be good to go unless you have other issues with the PR