Authors would like a better way of handling base64 encoded elements so they do not need to manage the base64 encoding themselves.
There may be multiple ways we could go about this:
Add a new FSH keyword (like Base64(...)). This would require a FSH spec change.
Automatically base64 encode strings that are on elements that have the base64Binary type. This would require first ensuring the string was not already base64 encoded.
Authors would like a better way of handling base64 encoded elements so they do not need to manage the base64 encoding themselves.
There may be multiple ways we could go about this:
Base64(...)). This would require a FSH spec change.First mentioned on Zulip: https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/215610-shorthand/topic/base64.20elements