Licence

[paulduchesne]

Space to discuss licencing of ontology. While I favour CC0 generally for ideological reasons, a consideration is that this project does incorporate textual and conceptual elements from other FIAF resources, which may carry their own licences.

other examples:

• PBCore uses CC-BY (although confusingly the git instance seems to be CC0).
• BIBFRAME appears to be CC0.

[stephenmcconnachie]

This is a useful resource, possibly, to inform thinking: the Wikimedia COmmons 'Choosing a Licence' article - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Choosing_a_license

[paulduchesne]

Thanks @stephenmcconnachie. One of the issues identified in the last meeting is that the work here leans very heavily on the cataloguing manual, which does not currently carry a licence.

[stephenmcconnachie]

We should advocate a process of asserting CC-BY or CC-0 for the Manual in tandem with this conversation, I think.... Might take longer as there is a print version without it etc. But at least we could align the two licencing conversations.

[paulduchesne]

Great idea! I will bring this up with @heftberger.

[annahoegner]

Regarding our discussion on the copyright of data, I'm pasting an excerpt of the EU database directive. I think there is no legislation for data outside some kind of technical framework. There is, however, the possiblity fpr contractual licensing of database contents: "The right referred to in paragraph 1 may be transferred, assigned or granted under contractual licence."

1. Member States shall provide for a right for the maker of a database which shows that there has been qualitatively and/or quantitatively a substantial investment in either the obtaining, verification or presentation of the contents to prevent extraction and/or re-utilization of the whole or of a substantial part, evaluated qualitatively and/or quantitatively, of the contents of that database.

2. For the purposes of this Chapter:

(a) ‘extraction’ shall mean the permanent or temporary transfer of all or a substantial part of the contents of a database to another medium by any means or in any form;

(b) ‘re-utilization’ shall mean any form of making available to the public all or a substantial part of the contents of a database by the distribution of copies, by renting, by on-line or other forms of transmission. The first sale of a copy of a database within the Community by the rightholder or with his consent shall exhaust the right to control resale of that copy within the Community;

Public lending is not an act of extraction or re-utilization.

3. The right referred to in paragraph 1 may be transferred, assigned or granted under contractual licence.

4. The right provided for in paragraph 1 shall apply irrespective of the eligibility of that database for protection by copyright or by other rights. Moreover, it shall apply irrespective of eligibility of the contents of that database for protection by copyright or by other rights. Protection of databases under the right provided for in paragraph 1 shall be without prejudice to rights existing in respect of their contents.

5. The repeated and systematic extraction and/or re-utilization of insubstantial parts of the contents of the database implying acts which conflict with a normal exploitation of that database or which unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the maker of the database shall not be permitted.on about the copyright of data

[paulduchesne]

Thank you for this information @annahoegner, sorry I only saw it now. I am going to close this ticket at after some internal conversation there is support that the ontology is released under CC-BY.