Open francescoloconte opened 9 months ago
@kleihan , if these simple types are not used in the schema, is this a sufficient reason to remove them? Or can there be other reasons for which they should remain even if not used? There may be aspects of the standard am I not familiar with, that justify these staying in the schema. If you confirm they can be removed, I would submit a PR to remove them, and close this ticket.
I can confirm that these are all unused, likely vestigial from Unified, and concur they can be removed.
The following types are defined in the schema but they do not seem to be used anywhere: