Open jonsneyers opened 9 years ago
I've made some test with Gralic, flic, qlic and PackPNM
I'm sorry I can't download yet some of image sets
KODAK Set:
- Gralic: 9 918 007
- Flic: 10 943 582
- PPN: 11 334 835
- Qlic: 13 125 746
Lucas Set:
- Gralic: 13 317 945
- Flic: 14 137 842
- PPN: 15 897 040
- Qlic: 25 522 176
png-gallery Set:
- Gralic: 3 162 045
- Flic: 3 686 370
- PPN: 3 459 921
- Qlic: 4 538 368
SMBC Set:
- Gralic: 3 546 141
- Flic: 4 368 284
- PPN: 4 439 027
- Qlic: 9 887 212
webp-gallery Set:
- Gralic: 305 443
- Flic: 392 799
- PPN: 350 012
- Qlic: 676 651
wikipedia-photos Set:
- Gralic: 62 818 086
- Flic: 66 847 472
- PPN: 73 449 832
- Qlic: 75 087 377
For comparison, these are the results I got for some recent version of FLIF:
Kodak set: 10 493 717 Lukas: 14 907 385 png-gallery: 4 118 486 SMBC: 2 896 567 webp-gallery: 395 129 wikipedia-photos: 69 733 385
Does anyone have some information on those other formats? Do they specialize in photographic images? Do they have progressive decoding?
They are just specialised compressor. Gralic, flic and qlic are not maintained and there's no source code.
Gralic, flic and qlic are well maintained, QLIC 2.demo was released today.
Thank you Alexander.
It was hard to find your news of your codec but I found it http://qlic.altervista.org/LPCB.html
(Also find really interresting discussions on encode.ru website)
Gralic, flic, qlic: see https://github.com/FLIF-hub/FLIF/issues/28