level 18 added

[omiras]

I added a new level.

Some questions:

1. How do you feel about wording an exercise that already has worked with the same array method? I did it this way:

2. I figured out I had to use very close values to create the exercise. Otherwise, the user could use a wide range of numbers to achieve the exercise

   
   var myGrass = [{name:'worm', weight: 21}, {name:'ladybug', weight: 20},
              {name:'spider', weight: 22}];

var hugeBugs = myGrass.filter(x => x.weight > 20);

3. @SaraaLee some lore added 😊
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3286458/198889873-464ad77d-baf7-4334-a825-bf843f32b5a3.png)

[Andreu-G]

For the naming convention, I have another suggestion: filter(); //2 That way the " -2 " isn't part of the method, and with // we're indicating it's a comment. I'd like to hear everyone else's opinion, however I think the semicolon should definitely "close" the method, as the number just indicates that it's another exercise, it is not part of the "code".

[SaraaLee]

This afternoon I'm going to see new level and lore. I’m so sorry that I’m late and missing.

[omiras]

For the naming convention, I have another suggestion: filter(); //2 That way the " -2 " isn't part of the method, and with // we're indicating it's a comment. I'd like to hear everyone else's opinion, however I think the semicolon should definitely "close" the method, as the number just indicates that it's another exercise, it is not part of the "code".

Thanks!! Suggestion committed.