If you transform a MARC bib with 780/785 preceding/succeeding title fields that do not have the subfields indicated by the mapping rules, the migration tools will happily create a preceding-succeeding-title record object that will post to FOLIO, but it will lack fields that FOLIO subsequently (and undocumented) expects it to have, specifically title. The migration tools should discard preceding-succeeding-title objects that do not have a title. FOLIO's MARC-Bib mapper appears to handle it this way. Thoughts, @banerjek?
If you transform a MARC bib with 780/785 preceding/succeeding title fields that do not have the subfields indicated by the mapping rules, the migration tools will happily create a preceding-succeeding-title record object that will post to FOLIO, but it will lack fields that FOLIO subsequently (and undocumented) expects it to have, specifically
title
. The migration tools should discard preceding-succeeding-title objects that do not have atitle
. FOLIO's MARC-Bib mapper appears to handle it this way. Thoughts, @banerjek?