Closed mi-hol closed 1 year ago
Concur, though IIUC we're in the clear about the license (non-commercial). But yes, OpenJDK is the way IMO.
I'll actually push back on this a little - there's potential for "ordinary users" to end up in a weird state here if they get recommended to install non-Oracle Java with it already installed.
This file has no control over what JRE the console uses, only what the launcher will recommend if you don't have it installed.
there's potential for "ordinary users" to end up in a weird state
Would you mind to elaborate? I had multiple ORACLE and non-ORACLE JREs installed in the past, the only issue I remember was that "java.exe" used the version first found in PATH variable. Easy fix: specify the path for the desired version.
I would strongly advise to switch to an open-source distribution due to ORACLE changing their license to be non-free some time ago. Recommended is a version with long-time support (LTS)