just some tidying; mainly was curious what the missing field in the type description is
seems this is a "legacy" field-options declaration -- perhaps we can finish the TODOs in the grammar and convert all of the config descriptions to not use these "legacy" specs
just some tidying; mainly was curious what the missing field in the type description is
seems this is a "legacy" field-options declaration -- perhaps we can finish the TODOs in the grammar and convert all of the config descriptions to not use these "legacy" specs