Open nmschulte opened 1 month ago
it seems rusefi/rusefi#4904 may have been merged without thorough review
does this change make sense? configuring idle stepper hardware should not depend on ETB function/configuration, right?
rusEFI has the same logic yet: https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/blob/master/firmware/tunerstudio/tunerstudio.template.ini#L3570 -- cc @rusefillc
also, perhaps still an issue exists if both ETB and idle stepper are trying to use the same hardware?
perhaps instead of this change, simply the condition should change from != to ==, and possibly moved to a higher order?
!=
==
last, mind this comment? is this still applicable now that h-bridge panels are split w/ rusefi/rusefi#4904?
rusefi/rusefi#5972 seems to be this issue; via: https://rusefi.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=49196#p49196 also: https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/commit/ca301e1479b157635b95e9055ec98246a535b37a
it seems rusefi/rusefi#4904 may have been merged without thorough review
does this change make sense? configuring idle stepper hardware should not depend on ETB function/configuration, right?
rusEFI has the same logic yet: https://github.com/rusefi/rusefi/blob/master/firmware/tunerstudio/tunerstudio.template.ini#L3570 -- cc @rusefillc
also, perhaps still an issue exists if both ETB and idle stepper are trying to use the same hardware?
perhaps instead of this change, simply the condition should change from
!=
to==
, and possibly moved to a higher order?last, mind this comment? is this still applicable now that h-bridge panels are split w/ rusefi/rusefi#4904?