FPetitprez / webMCP-counter

Shiny app to run MCP-counter and mMCP-counter
GNU General Public License v3.0
2 stars 2 forks source link

MCP-counter gene symbols #13

Closed sdcanli closed 2 years ago

sdcanli commented 2 years ago

Hi,

I am planning to run MCP-counter for a dataset. I generated the input file with gene symbols in the first column as requested. The dataset is in Illumina platform, and I guess MCP-counter is not designed to work with Illumina arrays at the probe level, therefore I generated the file using gene symbols. Since there are multiple probesets for some genes, I have more then one row for some genes as in the image below. image

My question is whether I should have only one row for each gene? Should I choose one based on average, varitation etc.

My second question is whether the normalization method matter for the MCP-counter to run and generate reliable results?

Thanks in advence

FPetitprez commented 2 years ago

Hello, and thank you for reaching out.

1) webMCP-counter only reads the first occurrence of each gene. This is a behavior that we plan to modify in the future, but for now, the other occurrences of each gene will be ignored. I would suggest to aggregate data by computing the average expression value for each gene. 2) Regarding normalization, the MCP-counter scores will be expressed in the same type of values as the genes expression you input. To have something that allows comparison between samples, you need a normalization method that allows to compare gene expression as well. My usual suggestion is to TPM, and use data in logarithm values, i.e. log2(1+TPM).

I hope this helps!

Best wishes, Florent

sdcanli commented 2 years ago

Hi ,

Thanks a lot for your quick response Florent. I will then calculate average for multiple occurences while using microarray data.

Best regards and thanks for this clear answer

FPetitprez commented 2 years ago

No problem, hope webMCP-counter is useful! If you use output from webMCP-counter in a publication, could you please consider citing the original MCP-counter article (in your case the human version https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1070-5) as well as the preprint for the web app (https://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.12.03.400754v1). Thank you in advance. Best regards, Florent