Until next session (14.01.2021) each participant will have to give constructive feedback on the conceptual abstracts of 2 groups they are not a member of.
The following steps have to be taken:
By everyone until tomorrow at 1 p.m.:
In the Sheet containing the project description write your name into one of the columns H-O (Reviewer x) in 2 rows corresponding to one project each.
Please only choose between Projects 1 - 8.
By each group once tomorrow after 1 p.m.:
Email your abstract to your reviewers (either as PDF or link to the issue on GitHub).
By everyone until Wednesday, 13.01. 8 p.m.:
Email your review to all members of the 2 groups you reviewed. Put me and Simon in CC.
How to provide Feedback:
Annotating and commenting the documents
Writing a short paragraph with your feedback (~150 Words)
The following questions can guide you in the process:
Are the main components present and understandable in the abstract? (research questions, material and data, technology and methods, analytical approach)
Is the research question relevant and interesting?
Can the research question be answered with the proposed approach?
Is the project doable in the amount of time available?
Until next session (14.01.2021) each participant will have to give constructive feedback on the conceptual abstracts of 2 groups they are not a member of.
The following steps have to be taken:
By everyone until tomorrow at 1 p.m.: In the Sheet containing the project description write your name into one of the columns H-O (Reviewer x) in 2 rows corresponding to one project each. Please only choose between Projects 1 - 8.
By each group once tomorrow after 1 p.m.: Email your abstract to your reviewers (either as PDF or link to the issue on GitHub).
By everyone until Wednesday, 13.01. 8 p.m.: Email your review to all members of the 2 groups you reviewed. Put me and Simon in CC.
How to provide Feedback: Annotating and commenting the documents Writing a short paragraph with your feedback (~150 Words)
The following questions can guide you in the process:
Are the main components present and understandable in the abstract? (research questions, material and data, technology and methods, analytical approach) Is the research question relevant and interesting? Can the research question be answered with the proposed approach? Is the project doable in the amount of time available?
Some further information on how to provide feedback can be found here: https://authorservices.wiley.com/Reviewers/journal-reviewers/how-to-perform-a-peer-review/step-by-step-guide-to-reviewing-a-manuscript.html
Please submit the reviews to the supervisors and the project members by 13 Jan 2021, 8pm.