Open fzahle opened 8 years ago
I have no objections using prefixes. Would that more or less replace the suffixes that are currently added in the components, i.e. suffix='_st'
?
yes, the suffix in the current version will be become part of the prefix.
FYI @tlbl and @pilotmm let me know if you have any comments.
And I won't merge this until we have adapted the other wrappers.
I think that change makes a lot of sense...
The blade planform is defined with the following parameters:
['x', 'y', 'z', 'rot_x', 'rot_y', 'rot_z', 'chord', 'rthick', 'p_le']
. In the old OpenMDAO they were nested inside a vartree, making it clear that all these parameters belonged to a planform definition. Now that vartrees no longer exist, the first version we did simply had the parameters added and promoted with the above names. While names likechord
are self-explanatoryx y z
are not. so to be more unambiguous I propose that we start using prefixes for these parameters, so they're referred to as e.g.blade_ae:s
andblade_ae:chord
. The pf parameters discretized for the structural calculations will then be namedblade_st:s
andblade_st:chord
.Any objections? @mrosemeier what do you think?