Closed dykesk closed 9 years ago
this has been updated - there is now a set of "NoFlow" aep base classes for the particular situation here where we assume a site resource for one turbine and multiply by the number of turbines and loss factors in order to get overall plant aep
Hi Katherine,
I can see you are defining a wind turbine within the aep_weibull_assembly
in basic_aep.py. It would be more consistent if you were using the class GenericWindTurbinePowerCurveVT in vt.py.
I can see that some code in the WeibullWindRose
component in comp.py is equivalent to some of your code in WeibullCDF
. I like that your component calculate the derivatives, but I'm unsure if it's worth the trouble now to change my component to include the WeibullCDF
in it.
Well, I have some performance issues with this part of the code, so it might be the best idea to do it anyway. I can see you are using a trapz instead of a quad for the integration. Yours is probably much faster.
If you don't mind, I close this issue, and add a new one concerning WeibullWindRose
cross check basic_aep setup with fused_wind to transfer base class material into plant_flow from basic_aep