Closed AhmetNSimsek closed 2 months ago
How is the performance compared to the previous implementation? comparable?
Since Neuroglancer precomputed images are not cached on disk, the testing time included the download and it is difficult to distinguish. With a resolution of 0.68 mm with an ethernet connection, the data is fetched and merged in 6-7s for both cases but nilearn seems to be very slightly faster. So I tested with nifti (Julich Brain 2.9 on MNI152). With nilearn average is about 0.34s while with the previous method it is about 0.37s. (repeated at least 5 times for each)
Based on the conversation at #561 Code to test: