Open mother10 opened 4 months ago
Just saw: in Belgium there also exists "ondertrouw".
Why is MARB more difficult? It does not say! I’m camping with very limited internet.
It sure sounds like a Marruage Bann with a few different rules!
Why not use MARB with a MARB.TYPE of “ondertrouw”?
At some point in the future we can eliminate MARB, MARL, and ENGA make a new tag called MARP “publicize”, with various MARP.TYPE MARP.KIND ways to make a public declaration.
Marriage Bans are meant to be used in a church, for a church wedding, for other people to give comment ot say its impossible. Ondertrouw is for municipality, as the first obligatory step for a civil marriage.
Yes I was indeed thinking of eliminating the other tags, same as was done for all those Naming tags.
There was already a discussion about KIND for MARR in #448 and #458 So thats why I mentioned this in my first post.
Discussion during GEDCOM Steering Committee meeting 15 OCT 2024:
MARB
.TYPE
and MARL
.TYPE
and 'EVEN.
TYPEcould each be argued to be correct or close enough (see further discussion in #505).
EVENis more likely to be preserved by programs that don't keep all event types.
MARBor
MARL` is more usable by programs that use marriage related events for hinting or display.TYPE
. So if one uses MARB
then it should have TYPE ondertrouw
.
You can find the complete DUTCH article about this here: https://blogbob.coret.org/2020/01/nederlandse-gedcom-afspraken-ondertrouw.html The article describes advises how to put "ondertrouw" in GEDCOM for different genealogy programs. Because GEDCOM does not have anything, yet, to properly handle it.
It would be helpfull if GEDCOM had a proper TAG or Tag-type for that.
The problem: What is "ondertrouw" (I translated the toppart of the article here)
It depends a bit of the city you live in but these are the steps:
Step1: At least 14 days before the wedding date, the couple must officially declare their intention to marry to the civil registrar (municipal official). This can be done in person at the municipality where one of the partners resides or online, depending on the municipality's services. Step 2: You need certain documents when you go in "ondertrouw". Step 3: The announcement period: The intention to marry must be announced publicly. This period is at least 14 days. During this time, the announcement is posted on the municipality’s public announcement board or website. Also checks are done to see if you can get married legally. (age, not married yet, etcetera)
After that you can get married. But you dont get any kind of paper of the "ondertrouw".
So this does not fit in anything the GEDCOM now has.
On the above mentioned site they advise to do it this way:
Some other advises on that page from/for Dutch users in the different programs used in the Netherlands:
In family Tree Builder: added as a fact for the family, the tag used is then: MARL
Ancestry Tree Manager:
So it is put in MARL.
Haza-Data and Humogen: they use MARB
Aldfaer Uses MARL
Centurial: Uses MARL
Rootsmagic 7: User made its own "fact" with the name "Ondertrouw" and it goes in an EVENT.
PRO-GEN: They use FAM.MARB. Although there was some doubt to use MARL.
Conclusion:
There is no unity in the handling of "ondertrouw" because GEDCOM does not know it.
Now I wonder, as for the different NAME possibilities there now is a general solution proposed with PART and TYPE, would it be possible to have something similar here? There will be more possibilities of "getting married" I am sure.
Any ideas?