Closed ryanprior closed 2 years ago
Isn’t this fixed by de645d8144e8a08f039a9c88185121ec81d957ef?
seems so indeed, but ideally it should be using a [remap] binding instead.
@wbolster That's a good point, I simply forgot remap bindings existed. Should be fixed now.
Just tried this the other day, works great! Thank you @dakra & @Fanael this package is a long time favorite!
When I edit in an indirect buffer and try to
save-buffer
I get prompted for a file name to save to, which reminds me that what I really wanted to do is to C-c '.However, is anybody really saving their indirect buffers to disk? It seems to me like the more expected and useful behavior would be to replace the code block we're indirect-editing and mark the indirect buffer as saved, but not close it.
If what you really want is to write to disk, you should
write-file
instead ofsave-buffer
. Does that make sense?