Open FantasticFiasco opened 18 hours ago
I wouldn't call it a workaround, it was changing it to implement the user agent spec. But if it can be skipped altogether in the signature then that's a good result
You are correct, my intention was not to downplay this contribution. Bad wording on my part, I'll update my text.
As it currently is worded, do you think it makes more sense, or can it be improved?
As it currently is worded, do you think it makes more sense, or can it be improved?
It's all good now thanks 🙂
Describe the bug
As described a review remark of #1207, let's analyze if we should skip the
User-Agent
header instead having special support for it in the codebase (#1155).