Closed cowtowncoder closed 2 years ago
Updated
https://github.com/FasterXML/smile-format-specification/blob/master/smile-specification.md
but no version change (since behavior clarified, not changed).
Will need to tackle Jackson Smile codec in future -- likely for 2.14 as this may (even it should not) affect some decoders, issue:
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-dataformats-binary/issues/300
As per:
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-dataformats-binary/issues/301
it looks like Smile Java doc by Jackson (jackson-dataformats-binary) has somewhat inconsistent encoding behavior of unused bits. It would make sense to clarify expected handling, along the lines of (I think?):