Closed ppalaga closed 5 months ago
Would be happy to merge this. Since there are non-test changes, one thing we need to have CLA (if not received yet, apologies if I missed it). One from Jackson repo:
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/blob/master/contributor-agreement.pdf
is one we use; it is usually easiest to print, fill & sign, scan/photo, email to cla
at fasterxml dot com.
Once I have CLA it's good for all future contributions.
Looking forward to merging this, thank you!
we need to have CLA
I asked our legal team for an approval.
Thank you @ppalaga .
Since the only remaining changes here are test improvements, I can merge without CLA -- will do so. (CLA needed for actual non-test code changes, just not test code)
@cowtowncoder our Legal team did not approve the CLA you pointed me to. The main concern lies in the broad scope of the copyright license, particularly with the request for joint ownership. I wonder if I may let them review the corporate CLA?
Yes CCLA makes sense then. Have had a few company submit that, including some of FAANGs; no real difference for us.
@cowtowncoder this is a preparation for the fix of #179: