Closed stanio closed 2 months ago
@cowtowncoder, would you review this, when you get the time?
Hi @stanio! Thank you for contributing this & apologies for slow follow-up.
I am traveling for work this week but will try to review this when I get home.
@stanio I am now reviewing this and it looks good so far so I think there won't be issues.
But one last process thing before I can merge the fix is to get a CLA from
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/blob/master/contributor-agreement.pdf
(unless you have sent one for Woodstox or Jackson contributions).
It's usually easiest to print, fill & sign, scan/photo, email to cla
at fasterxml dot com.
Once we get it, CLA is good for any and all contributions to FasterXML projects so it's one-time-only thing.
Looking forward to merging this; will now complete the review.
Ok, so after getting CLA & merging, I think I'll backport this into 6.6 for inclusion in 6.6.3 (should be easy to cherry-pick).
Thank you again for contributing this!
I have sent my CLA earlier today.
Merged into master
for eventual 7.0.0, but also backported into 6.x for 6.7.0
Addresses #204:
The latter is a secondary issue noted in the original report.