Open djonn opened 3 months ago
Not sure if this should just be a change of the texts shown on the website or if we should rename in our code + db schema
Really depends on how thorough we want to be - Personally, I think we should rename it across the entire system, just to avoid confusion 🤷🏽
The even bigger option would be to introduce a "location/office" concept, so users can be assigned to a location and then we can have different "team/seat names" for different locations.
@Faustvii Yagni? - or are we planning on adding the other games soon™️ so other offices can use the leaderboard (assuming they will use it)?
I think they wanted to use it in Aalborg for some other games, but yeah it was to start some of the "prep" work I guess. I have heard other people here at the office wants it for other games 😄 But I agree it is way overkill.
I think that the easiest solution by far for multiple other games / other offices is to do a second deployment. So we should consider if it's worth it in complexity to have it be part of a single deployment
Based on your comments I suggest that this task is remade into the first step of the bigger plan of getting a more generic Team/Position solution.
What are your takes @Faustvii @djonn
I can't really tell how much code-complexity I recon this will add, but I am a bit worried about the complexity vs. the added value from that complexity 🤔
We still use black/white teams even though we have changed discs multiple times since then.
I think we should update the text for the team "names" to be based on the seating locations of the teams rather than the colors.
Not sure if this should just be a change of the texts shown on the website or if we should rename in our code + db schema 🤔