Open skobkin opened 1 year ago
Something like this is pretty much the end-goal for synchronization, though it's gonna take a while.
This issue hasn't seen any activity for 30 days. Please comment (or remove the stale label) within 5 days, otherwise this issue will be closed.
Should feature request be automatically closed?
Well, I use it more as a reminder that says "hey, you either forgot about this issue, or it's no longer relevant".
This issue hasn't seen any activity for 30 days. Please comment (or remove the stale label) within 5 days, otherwise this issue will be closed.
The issue has been closed due to inactivity.
This issue hasn't seen any activity for 30 days. Please comment (or remove the stale label) within 5 days, otherwise this issue will be closed.
Introduction
Synchronization feature is a very good tool for many instances. But it has some flaws.
For example, not every instance blocks any other which is considered "bad", but still wants to use benefits of community-driven moderation lists. Some just limits them leaving their users a freedom of information and ability to still manually follow users from the "bad" instance.
So here's an idea: list mapping.
Examples
So for example you can set your own sync profile by selecting sanctions and strategies for fediseer list. For example:
Sync settings 1 (default):
Sync setting 2 (custom)
Sync setting 3 (custom)
Explanation
Strategies
Instance sanctions