Open iaacornus opened 1 year ago
the project also plans to introduce config for easy reproducible starting setup, the config would allow the user to utilize the features of the program in a fully autonomous manner
the basic initial config as of this comment:
{
"afi_conf": "iaacornus/Fedora-OSTree-Setup/devel/config/app_for_install.json",
"afu_conf": "iaacornus/Fedora-OSTree-Setup/devel/config/app_for_removal.json",
"tprepo-i": [
"rpm_rfusion_f",
"rpm_rfusion_nf",
"rpm_rfusion_tainted",
"rpm_rfusion_nf_tained",
"fp_flathub",
"fp_fed_oci",
"fp_kde",
"fp_gnome_nightly"
],
"cdrv-i": true,
"wq_ssd-d": true,
"toolbox-r": true,
"wayland_ff-e": true,
"ff_rpm-r": true,
"ppd-r": true,
"deep-sw": true,
"batt_thresh": 80,
"bpkgs-r": true,
"fish-s": true,
"fish-mod": {
"greetings": null
},
"rfusion-ri": true
}
afi_conf
and afu_conf
takes the config file which is a list of program that will be installed and uninstalled, respectively, has the same format as default, the value has a format of user/repo/<branch: optional>/file_dir
, #13 , #36 , #37 tprepo_i
(#15 ) takes an array of repo id which is hard coded in the program, the default (will be further expanded) includes:cdrv-i
, takes bool, whether to automatically install drvs and codecs #15 wq_ssd-d
, takes bool, whether to disable workspace queue #35 toolbox-r
, takes bool, whether to replace toolbox with distrobox #34 wayland_ff-e
,takes bool, whether to enable wayland rendering in firefox #44 ff_rpm-r
, takes bool, whether to replace firefox rpm with firefox from flathub #48 ppd-r
, takes bool, whether to replace power-profiles-daemon
with tlp
, #48 deep-sw
, takes bool, whether to switch from s2idle
to deep
sleep, #43 batt_thresh
, takes int, the value to set in battery threshold, #39 bpkgs-r
, takes bool, whether to remove the base packages on given config afu_conf
, #37 , #36 fish-sw
, takes bool, whether to replace bash with fish shell, #14 fish-mod
, takes dictionary, which contains a key value pair of modifications and its values, #58 rfusion-ri
, takes bool, whether to reinstall rpmfusion or not, #42 I would say installing Flatpaks is also step 1. Somewhere I read it is not recommended to layer packages with the initial update, but I dont think adding repos could hurt.
I would say installing Flatpaks is also step 1. Somewhere I read it is not recommended to layer packages with the initial update, but I dont think adding repos could hurt.
thats an interesting suggestion, but i agree that maybe we should commence a full system upgrade first before doing modifications and what not
I think we should go away from the "as little as possible" approach.
If we can build a custom image without client-side layering, why not do it perfectly? In the docker build on Github you can edit everything, place custom files and more. You can remove all those weird free codecs and drivers and replace them with working ones from rpmfusion for example.
The process is like that:
the mechanism of program is described as follows:
some of the currently implemented features includes:
work in progress