search

FeiGeChuanShu / ncnn_Android_MoveNet

Android MoveNet pose estimation by ncnn
125 stars 39 forks source link

The speed might not fast as the tflite version? #6

Closed FreedoomG closed 2 years ago

FreedoomG commented 2 years ago

Hi there, I used the lightning model and the after-treatment from this project and find the fps is about 20 and up to 25 which is not fast as the original tflite version. I'm not sure the reason, there's my doubt:

  1. the after-treatment cause more computing resources?
  2. there are some opt. in ncnn can be opened, such as vulkan?
  3. the model in ncnn is natively slower than tflite cuz the tflite model is also optimized? Could you give some enlightenment about these? Thx
soham24 commented 2 years ago

@FreedoomG how much fps you are getting in tflite implementation ?

FreedoomG commented 2 years ago

I think is the java camera framework's problem which is slower in image transportation than using the c++ camera framework.