Closed JonasSchaub closed 2 months ago
The exported PDF and CSV files did not have to be updated as described in the issue because they do not contain the sample parents or their names.
@FelixBaensch could you maybe inspect the visual changes in the GUI and let me know what you think?
I find the new arrangement takes a bit of getting used to. Maybe it looks better if the SMILES column is in front of the structure columns.
Hm, I don't know. I think the most important thing here are the fragment structures. And textual column in front that is not a name/ID is also odd, IMHO.
S. P. Name is somehow odd and I don't like it.
Do you have alternative suggestions, maybe? There is not a lot space available in the header and I don't like the header labels being abbreviated in the default size.
Hm, I don't know. I think the most important thing here are the fragment structures. And textual column in front that is not a name/ID is also odd, IMHO.
I fully agree that the most important thing is the fragment structure, but it's more pleasing to my eye this way. We could get Achim's professional opinion.
Do you have alternative suggestions, maybe? There is not a lot space available in the header and I don't like the header labels being abbreviated in the default size.
No, not really. How about just omitting the "Sample" and only mentioning in the tool tip and tutorial that there are several? And swap the "parent" for something like "source" or "root"? Gemini suggested "Parent Hierarchy".
We could get Achim's professional opinion.
I've e-mailed him with you in Cc.
Achims's suggestion: SMILES - Structure - Parent Name - Parent Structure - ...
I will look into this tomorrow.
I like Achim's suggestion ;D
By the way, the arrangement of the columns can be customized by the user during a session. It is just not persisted.
By the way, the arrangement of the columns can be customized by the user during a session. It is just not persisted.
Ah wow, I did not know that, thanks!
Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code
The new fragments tab arrangement:
@FelixBaensch do you like it?
@FelixBaensch do you like it?
Since it pretty much implements my suggestions, yes!