Open ArnoVel opened 4 years ago
As a reference:
0.166,
0.166,
0.167,
0.166,
0.143,
0.143,
0.143,
0.143,
0.143,
0.143,
0.142,
0.5,
0.25,
0.25,
0.25,
0.25,
0.5,
1,
1,
0.166,
0.167,
0.333,
0.333,
0.334,
0.125,
0.125,
0.125,
0.125,
0.125,
0.125,
0.125,
0.125,
0.2,
0.2,
0.2,
0.2,
0.2,
0.25,
0.25,
0.25,
0.25,
0.5,
0.25,
0.25,
0.25,
0.25,
1,
1,
0.333,
0.333,
0.334,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.083,
0.083,
0.084,
0.083,
0.083,
0.084,
0.083,
0.083,
0.084,
0.333,
0.333,
0.334,
1,
1,
1,
0,
1 ,
0.083,
0.083,
0.084,
1,
0.5,
0.3333,
0.3333,
0.3334,
0.3333,
0.3333,
0.3334,
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0.25,
0.25,
0.25,
0.25,
1,
0.3333,
0.3333,
0.3333,
0.2,
0.2,
1.0,
1.0,
0.5,
0.2,
0.2,
0.2,
0 0.5,
1
1
1
is the list of weights for the current dataset (108 pairs). The current TCEP version differs from the CDT one in the following:
edit: Most missing pair have a corresponding weight of 0.
Hi, The difference between the datasets comes from the version of the Tuebingen Cause-effect-pairs datasets. I might update that as well. I will update the weights very soon, thanks for the contribution !
Hi, Many different papers related to bivariate causal discovery discuss the necessity of attaching a weight to each pair to account for the fact they come from the same joint distribution.
I do not see this as an option currently in CDT.
Would this possibly be an option in later releases? :)
Thanks!