Closed AndrewMagliozzi closed 10 years ago
Many branches have already been merged into master. git branch -d <branch_name>
will work without complaint so long as that is the case.
I've got a feature branch or two in the works. Not sure if I pushed to master, but I will. Those will say "not merged into master! don't delete!"
But then some branches might have been abandoned long ago without being merged. If the last commit on a branch is older than some date, maybe 3-6 months ago, it's ripe for delete. Otherwise we should at least take a look at what the branch is and talk about deleting it.
cool. I trust you to do cleanup. Let's discuss Tuesday. No urgency on this.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Bryan Bonvallet notifications@github.comwrote:
Many branches have already been merged into master. git branch -d
will work without complaint so long as that is the case. I've got a feature branch or two in the works. Not sure if I pushed to master, but I will. Those will say "not merged into master! don't delete!" But then some branches might have been abandoned long ago without being merged. If the last commit on a branch is older than some date, maybe 3-6 months ago, it's ripe for delete. Otherwise we should at least take a look at what the branch is and talk about deleting it. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/FinalsClub/karmaworld/issues/301#issuecomment-33154841 .
Done
we only use 'master'