Open mark-barnes opened 4 years ago
After discussing in the working group meeting, we think these competencies need a more broad review. The examples and the competencies don't fully match up. We may also update the use of "project" as part of this.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Reopening, we probably should have disabled stale bot while we were on hiatus.
in the competencies "Makes pragmatic decisions about technical trade-offs beyond their project, e.g. " and "Makes pragmatic decisions about technical trade-offs within their project, e.g. "
is "project" misleading? - its an overused word. could be task/user story/initiative/team etc etc need a way to clarify the word.