Closed funwaa closed 3 years ago
Thanks for the PR! After taking a more in-depth look at the change (a.k.a more than 2 seconds) it does not seem that this change is what Arthurism wanted in their issue but it's a good addition nonetheless.
Thanks for the PR! After taking a more in-depth look at the change (a.k.a more than 2 seconds) it does not seem that this change is what Arthurism wanted in their issue but it's a good addition nonetheless.
Hm, I'm not quite sure what they meant with their issue. Do you understand and can you explain it better?
Thanks for the PR! After taking a more in-depth look at the change (a.k.a more than 2 seconds) it does not seem that this change is what Arthurism wanted in their issue but it's a good addition nonetheless.
Hm, I'm not quite sure what they meant with their issue. Do you understand and can you explain it better?
HEX8 is just HEX with alpha. Decimal is the color represented as a numerical value. I've implemented it locally which you can see below
Thanks for the PR! After taking a more in-depth look at the change (a.k.a more than 2 seconds) it does not seem that this change is what Arthurism wanted in their issue but it's a good addition nonetheless.
Hm, I'm not quite sure what they meant with their issue. Do you understand and can you explain it better?
HEX8 is just HEX with alpha. Decimal is the color represented as a numerical value. I've implemented it locally which you can see below
Oh I see. Using ${parseInt(color.toHex(), 16)}
would've worked aswell, right?
Oh I see. Using ${parseInt(color.toHex(), 16)} would've worked aswell, right?
Indeed it would, didn't think of using that :joy:
That's probably a better method than what I've done so I'll change it to that
Adding 8-digit HEX string representation to fix issue #119