List of optional options could have lower priority

[fabianski7]

Your app works great for sending the packet through devices over the local network, but I couldn't do it when I'm not on the internal network.

I tested the same configuration that I use (and that works) in this app.

[Florianisme]

Hi, that's odd. Especially if it's the same configuration. What's the Broadcast Address that you are using if you are waking your devices from the public internet (I don't want your actual value, just which device's address it is).

Is it for example the public IP of your router?

[fabianski7]

I don't know what I did here :S

[fabianski7]

I am sorry, I was confusing the fields "IP Status" with "Broadcast Address". That's why it didn't work.

But if I could suggest something to you, the "IP Status" field could be moved into a category of its own, just like "Security" is, and also moved lower down in the list of options. That way the optional fields would have less relevance and you would avoid situations like this. Or maybe create a category called "Optionals" and put SecureOn and IP Status together. You will know what is best.

Thank you very much for your work on this app, it works great!

[Florianisme]

Ah, glad it's not actually a programming error :) Yeah that could be an improvement.

The idea was that the status IP would be filled out so commonly that it doesn't make sense to hide it besides other options. I could however also add a small explanation below it, I'll see if that works.

[Florianisme]

What's your opinion on this? I also added a short explanation to the input

[fabianski7]

Much better!

[Florianisme]

Part of Beta 1.8.3 which rolled out right now

Edit: Note to myself: add missing translations for explanation text and extract into i18n

[fabianski7]

thank you for your work!

[Florianisme]

I'll keep this open until it is published in production. Just to keep track :)

[Florianisme]

Released with 1.9.0