Finish report (final version)

[FlorisWL]

General:

• [x] Make interactive pdf, so ToC on the side, and refs and ToC that actually link to place in document.
• [x] Make a better looking title page (UPDATE: kinda done, but maybe photoshop all joint force diagrams in the figure, like in the image on your top left)
• [x] Make page numbering correct at start of document
• [x] Update images with Visualization Global cluster in action (if there are any), since Resultant visualization has changed
• [x] Go through all LaTeX files and check for comments
• [x] Proofread all
• [x] Let somebody else proofread all(?)
• [x] Uitlijning fixen, geen gekke nieuwe pagina's enzo op rare plekken (eindredactie)
• [x] spellcheck new bits (or all?)
• [x] Update main.bib

Regarding feedback from greenlight and definitive green light session:

• [x] Rewrite summary
• [x] fix and add certain references (Autodesk software, BHoM, summary, GS in introduction, ...)
• [x] Process small feedback points
• [x] Process all feedback points (of JC)
• [x] Add names of participants to acknowledgements (notify them, ask if they are ok with being named)
• [x] Conclusions and recommendations "verder inkorten en verscherpen"

Up to and including ToC:

• [x] Write preface
• [x] Write acknowledgements

Results:

• [x] Add part about how the tool determines what is 'inside' and 'outside'
• [x] Mention that a lower fitness value means a more efficient structure.
• [x] Maybe add an image that displays the Solve Global Forces visualizations, and explain a bit in text? Now it's shown nowhere...

Validation:

• [x] Write section 'User experiment'
• [x] Incorporate setup time, computation time, and optimization time EDIT 4/1: meh, laat maar zitten, is toch arbitrary
• [x] Redo the case study part. Forces were other way around, biggest force was on edge joint instead of middle joint...
• [x] Add data of last additions to UE
• [x] Proofread and check 5.4

Discussion:

• [x] Write Objectives
• [x] Write out properly Limitations
• [x] Add something about the imperfection of optimization in Limitations UPDATE: doen we niet meer, staat in ch4 nu.
• [x] Check if points of 5.3 (main weaknesses/limitations according to users) and 5.4 (my evaluation/discussion of experiment) are properly incorporated here
• [x] Write Sustainability

Conclusion:

• [x] Write 'Recommendations'
• [x] Rewrite Conclusion

Appendices:

• [x] Add BHoM to Appendix A (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOclwkfdm9U)
• [x] Incorporate the user experiment manual
• [x] User experiment results

Code/files:

• [x] C# code, put on github. My github? Special BE github? ask committee.
• [x] GH clusters, same as above
• [x] GH scripts used for thesis, same as above

[FlorisWL]

When proofreading:

• How is the tool addressed throughout the report? Is it OK like this, or should it be more consistent?

[FlorisWL]

Submitted