Closed martgil closed 1 month ago
Hello @sosnovsky, this is now ready for a review.
It's also been helpful if we could share a build for him. But generally speaking, the bug is fixed and the "noname" multipart/encrypted where successfully recognized.
I'll be crafting a custom build and share it with them once I have your approval. Thank you!
This PR Improves detection for an
multipart/encrypted
emails withapplication/pgp-encrypted
parts.close #5726
Tests (delete all except exactly one):
I have asked the sender of the test email if we can incorporate the sent test email to our codebase.Edit: I have been able to replace the sensitive part of the email while still preserving the main email structure of a multipart/encrypted email so asking for the actual email is not necessary needed.
To be filled by reviewers
I have reviewed that this PR... (tick whichever items you personally focused on during this review):