Closed jacktang closed 2 years ago
Hi, extending the ROM base class to allow for parametrized ROMs is on my TODO list. Until then the suggested way of inheriting from CNM is a reasonable idea. As you mentioned already, you will have to overwrite the constructor and the *predict** functions in the derived class. On the modeling side, extending CNM is not straightforward. Do your parameters potentially change over time (e.g. in a flow-control setting)? I would recommend getting in touch with @rsemaan, who has supervised some student projects on this matter. Cheers, Andre
Hi, As Andre mentioned, extending CNM to a parametric setting is not a straightforward manner. There are many details one must consider. In fact, it is a current research activity in my team. I am hoping we will have a control-oriented (parametric) version released in a few months.
Regards, Richard
@AndreWeiner @rsemaan Thanks for the response!
Do your parameters potentially change over time (e.g. in a flow-control setting)?
Yes, this the case I am now working on.
And yes the idea (using cmn) mentioned above is quite different from the implementation of pydmd, I am studying the paper and code, and try to apply on my case
Alright, good luck with the experimentation/implementation! I'll close this issue for now, but feel free to re-open it if needed. Cheers, Andre
Hello,
Is it possible to build parametric ROM using CMN? In my case, the prediction is not only depends on the
init_state
, but also theother_params
. Some codes looks like below:And my current idea is going to to create the new class, say
ParametricCMN
which inherit fromCMN
, and then customize the newtransition_prob
, and put theother_params
transition_prob. Is that right direction?