For reviews that summarize a few different technologies (e.g., Nowacek et al., 2016), should these each be listed as an additional data type with respective FAIR scoring? Or, for review articles, should the focus be on bio-logging devices (and their sections) alone?
We're limiting the rubric to newly collected biologging data. So for the Nowacek paper, they're reviewing practices, not presenting new data. So it's NA for device type etc.
For reviews that summarize a few different technologies (e.g., Nowacek et al., 2016), should these each be listed as an additional data type with respective FAIR scoring? Or, for review articles, should the focus be on bio-logging devices (and their sections) alone?
Thanks!!
Emily