FlukeAndFeather / openbiologging

https://flukeandfeather.github.io/openbiologging/
2 stars 3 forks source link

Scoring conservation claims #6

Open FlukeAndFeather opened 1 year ago

FlukeAndFeather commented 1 year ago

@RachelBuxton what do you think we should include in the scoring rubric re: conservation claims?

RachelBuxton commented 1 year ago

Hi Max et al.

How about something simple like: (as per Williams et al. 2020 https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/conl.12720)

Does the paper mention conservation (search the paper for "conserv*")? -> if yes

Does the paper discuss threats (Fig. 1a from Williams et al. 2020) (search the paper for "threat" OR "driver")? Does the paper discuss actions (Fig. 1b from Williams et al. 2020) (search the paper for "manag" OR "action" OR "solution" OR "mitigation" OR "restor" OR "recover" OR "implement*")

Do these key words make sense to you?

Hope this is helpful!

FlukeAndFeather commented 1 year ago

This is great! We added a **conserv*** field to the broad pass rubric and we can add the deeper questions to the fine-scale rubric