Flutterwave / Node-v3

NodeJS Library for Flutterwave for Business (F4B) v3 APIs
https://developer.flutterwave.com/
MIT License
26 stars 21 forks source link

Typed version of the library #139

Open olawalejuwonm opened 8 months ago

olawalejuwonm commented 8 months ago

Is there a plan for the typed version of this library? If not, I will be glad to contribute

bytes-of-tsena commented 8 months ago

it'd be nice if you sent in a PR for this, it'll help a lot :handshake:

olawalejuwonm commented 8 months ago

it'd be nice if you sent in a PR for this, it'll help a lot 🤝

Sure, but I can't do that alone. This will require something like a roadmap to make the contribution seamless

mwelwankuta commented 6 months ago

is this issue still open?

olawalejuwonm commented 6 months ago

Yes

On Fri, Jan 5, 2024, 13:11 Mwelwa @.***> wrote:

is this issue still open?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Flutterwave/Node-v3/issues/139#issuecomment-1878570526, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMSQ2BCOVIRZNQNB3J4CXQLYM7UXBAVCNFSM6AAAAAA6NX5POSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQNZYGU3TANJSGY . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

luigimorel commented 5 months ago

it's counter-intuitive to me that a company like FW would have no typed version

corneliusyaovi commented 5 months ago

Hello everyone👋🏾, Thank you all for volunteering to contribute.

The team is working on a roadmap and contribution guidelines to better manage this library. We would absolutely love everyone to contribute here and would communicate the roadmap soon.

Habinezajanvier commented 3 months ago

Any progress on the roadmap and contribution guidelines

nikeokoronkwo commented 1 week ago

I had started working on this, hoping to reach out and discuss with the Flutterwave team on how to implement this, but after some research, it seems that typescript support isn't a major concern of the Flutterwave Team: https://github.com/Flutterwave/Node-v3/issues/69#issuecomment-1874678738