Open theabhirath opened 2 years ago
I would prefer Pollen.jl because it accepts more formats including notebooks.
For the last point, I would prefer to have a developer section directly in the docs (where contributing already lives) instead of enabling the wiki feature. My previous experience with GitHub wikis has been poor, and it does not make sense to split the documentation in two places.
One of the main questions I have regarding Pollen is if there is support for documenting multiple versions of the same package? This is something I suspect we will need quite a bit when 0.8 lands, since that will be massively breaking.
Support in Pollen.jl for documenting multiple versions kinda works but is not great rn, i.e. no GitHub Action when a new version is tagged, no version picker in the frontend. Improving this is something I have been working on, but I will have little bandwidth to continue that work until the beginning of September. In parallel, I have been working on making it fully compatible with Documenter.jl syntax. So, I wouldn't propose moving to Pollen.jl right now, but we could either postpone a move or move to Documenter.jl with the option of easily switching to Pollen.jl later once that is possible.
This issue us is part of the v0.8 milestone. What needs to be done to close it?
The current documentation format is a little weird and Publish exposes a lot of private functions in the API reference as well. There are several steps that need to be decided on:
Layers
module, and exposing the API reference for it in a separate, visible place. This includes customLayers
options likeAdaptiveMeanMaxPool
being added in #174, which we could even export from Metalhead itself for ease of usecc @darsnack @ToucheSir @lorenzoh for the Documenter/Pollen migration, which is probably the highest priority on this list