Closed hattrill closed 1 year ago
Issue List (edit to update): Adding significant issues to https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CwWgdn4DZlNryiu8vzj0e6e6js3PWwUy2CXQ4Fm3roI/edit#gid=0
INPUT
GRAPH NETWORK
Can't seem to generate a graph network [FIXED]
edges need to be different colours to see overlaps
With large gene sets would be good if nodes were more seperate e.g. here the abnormal cell number hides the DO overlaps - can we use colour to help here?
The selection buttons aren't super-obvious as being alternative choices
SETS
Generic GO consortium Subsets (GO slim) looks like old FB SLIM1. Update with the GOC labelled as goslim_generic in go-basic.obo
Should we include the AGR and fly ribbon subsets? If we do want to have this limited set, should just use the AGR subset across the organsims for consistency.
Looks like only "hierarchy" set uses hierarchy. All except direct should use hierarchy - I think we should get rid off 'direct' as it's not correct to use it like this.
Slimming over regulation in BP would be a nice addition? should we add this set?
Remove root terms from sets as either used with ND evidence code to show that nothing is known or, if using graph then everything in tht aspect will map up: GO:0008150 biological_process GO:0003674 molecular_function GO:0005575 cellular_component
COMPLEAT sets don't seem to make much sense: think that we should restict these to geniune complexes or interpretation will be confusing with other sets.
Look at the way that the expression sets have been generated. Preferred tissue (modEncode RNA_seq) - I don't think that this works very well for enrichment - how can we improve this?
Expression annotation AGR - looks like just direct to terms - would be better if used ontology structure - perhaps we could use the AGR slim for this?
BAR VISUALIZATION
RESULTS TABLE
DOC Some of FAQ and Genesets info should be together
OTHER SPECIES ISSUES
When on results page, click NEW SEARCH button goes back to drosophila pge https://www.flyrnai.org/tools/pangea/web/home/7227 [added issue to Testing sheet]
Worm example list and background are the same [added issue to Testing sheet]
Worm phenotype section contains expression [added issue to Testing sheet]
. For Rat and Z. fish the test set when combined with an EBI CP enrichment brings up a query error [added issue to Testing sheet]
Other
TESTERS SHEET: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CwWgdn4DZlNryiu8vzj0e6e6js3PWwUy2CXQ4Fm3roI/edit#gid=0
Nice Examples for paper: to show also non-overlapping set
Example of where groups overlap and don't
Good example of how different BP and CCs group . With more colours, this would be clearer.
TEST SETS FLY QuickSearch, pheno_anat fat body fat_body_affected.txt
WORM using phenotype ontology viewer for query: List of 247 genes that were annotated with WBPhenotype:0000598 alimentary system morphology variant or any of its transitive descendant genes_direct_and_inferred_for_WBPhenotype 0000598.txt
For Worm BP using hier. showing overlap between endocytosis digestive tract morphogenesis tube development
Note about advantages: can use enrichment and classification on same sets
Nice illustration of how certain diseases are associated with certain cell features/exp using http://preview.flybase.org/reports/FBgg0000056.html gene group.
and with even more anat/cc/disease
Still a few issues remain when running a multiple search query:
1) When I run a multiple search I never get to the result page automatically, I always have to click on the “Results” button for redirection
2) Typo after submission: “Cacluation progress” instead of “Calculation progress” (see previous screenshot)
3) It seems when I select all rows to plot, no graph gets generated. It works as intended when you just select a subset of rows
4) overlapping labels in graph is still a issue (Gene
5) Maybe this is more like a preference, but it would be nice if the multiple search results table could show p-value corrections like in the single search
Multiple search
Single search
@gantonazzo I am just making a ticket to list the issues that we come across. Perhaps we can reciprocally test the bugs to see if we see them
https://www.flyrnai.org/tools/pangea/web/home/7227