search

FlyBase / drosophila-phenotype-ontology

The home of the Drosophila phenotype ontology
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
4 stars 1 forks source link

review 'rate' phenotyes #148

Closed Clare72 closed 2 years ago

Clare72 commented 2 years ago

Make sure 'rate' is in label and that definition is clear about different possible meanings of rate

Clare72 commented 2 years ago

Given the current 'accelerated'/'slower' definitions of the premature/delayed aging phenotypes, these seem like they would be better suited to RateOfContinuousProcess patterns (for speed of a continuous process, rather than frequency or proportion of time of a process that may stop and start). Labels should probably also be something like 'increased aging speed' and 'decreased aging speed'.

What do you think @arzuozturk @vmt25 ?

Clare72 commented 2 years ago

also, are you happy with labels of 'hyperactive' and 'hypoactive'? Or should these be 'increased/decreased rate of movement'?

arzuozturk commented 2 years ago

_Given the current 'accelerated'/'slower' definitions of the premature/delayed aging phenotypes, these seem like they would be better suited to RateOfContinuousProcess patterns (for speed of a continuous process, rather than frequency or proportion of time of a process that may stop and start). Labels should probably also be something like 'increased aging speed' and 'decreased aging speed'.

What do you think @arzuozturk @vmt25 ?_

Sounds reasonable to me.

also, are you happy with labels of 'hyperactive' and 'hypoactive'? Or should these be 'increased/decreased rate of movement'?

As long as their definitions are the same, I don't mind the names. If changing them to 'increased/decreased rate of movement' makes sense ontologically please go ahead and do it.

Thanks. Arzu