Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
[sorry about the typo in the subject line]
Original comment by holden...@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2008 at 6:17
My workaround isn't a workaround: the shadowed subdirectories don't appear,
meaning I
don't have a working installation :(
Original comment by holden...@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2008 at 6:31
Problem acknowledged and reproduced on a different version of Vista. Looking
for a
solution.
Original comment by andre.ro...@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2008 at 11:34
New version (zipped with a different tool) uploaded which should work. A
confirmation would be appreciated.
Original comment by andre.ro...@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2008 at 11:48
Since this new file has been downloaded 6 times and no further issues have been
entered, I will consider this bug fixed.
Original comment by andre.ro...@gmail.com
on 5 Dec 2008 at 2:25
I am afraid this issue is not fixed by the new file, which is twice as large as
its
predecessor. Further, I am not sure this is a Vista issue: the original problem
seemed to be that directories were being included in the zipfile contents as
regular
file.
The current download does indeed unzip correctly under Vista, but as well as the
crunchy directory it contains a crunchy1.0alpha1.zip file, which appears to be
the
original download. This probably accounts for the increased fiel size.
I took the original file and used the following program to extract its contents:
import os
def md(path):
if os.path.exists(path):
return
else:
print "Creating directory", path
os.makedirs(path)
from zipfile import ZipFile
z = ZipFile("crunchy1.0alpha1.zip")
for zz in z.infolist():
if zz.file_size:
print "Unpacking", zz.filename
d, f = os.path.split(zz.filename)
md(d)
fil = z.read(zz.filename)
ofil = open(zz.filename, 'w')
ofil.write(fil)
ofil.close()
Original comment by holden...@gmail.com
on 8 Dec 2008 at 1:20
Thanks for the comment and the workaround; it worked ok when I tested it and I
had
not noticed the larger size.
Reopening the issue - won't have time to look at it for a few days
unfortunately.
Original comment by andre.ro...@gmail.com
on 8 Dec 2008 at 2:39
This is an issue with packaging the old version - should not be kept as a valid
issue
for the 1.0 release.
Original comment by andre.ro...@gmail.com
on 19 Aug 2009 at 9:54
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
holden...@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2008 at 6:17