Closed geek4unix closed 3 years ago
I think it's 8064m/h
, the 3 digits in the non integer part of the number make the comma easily mistakable by a thousand separator.
That's only a suspicion though.
If that's indeed the case, I'd say that having only 2 digits after the comma to avoid this misinterpretation should be a good solution since 5m/h doesn't seem to be a relevant resolution in this context and can be ignored.
Maybe even just keeping one or no digits after the comma would be enough? I don't have proper insight into the technical side of the meteorological data to make such a call.
Maybe i just read it wrong in that case @mamoit . Appreciate you letting me know
I noticed while browsing: https://fogos.pt/fogo/2020050015669
The windspeed seems a little high.
Wind Speed: 8,064 km / h