FontBureau / Opentype-1.8-Axis-Proposal

Apache License 2.0
0 stars 1 forks source link

Proposal Layout #48

Closed sberlow closed 6 years ago

sberlow commented 6 years ago

Side bar Overview Proposed Axes

Parametric -xtra -xopq -ytra -yopq -ytlc -ytuc -ytde -ytas

Composite -pwth -pwht

Proposal -Administrative -General Technical Information -Proposed Axis Details -Justification

Glossary

Proposal layout.pdf

dberlow commented 6 years ago

Please add the parametric versions of weight and width To the initial proposal.

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 1, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Sam Berlow notifications@github.com wrote:

Side bar Overview Proposed Axes

Parametric -xtra -xopq -ytra -yopq -ytlc -ytuc -ytde -ytas

Proposal -Administrative -General Technical Information -Proposed Axis Details -Justification

Glossary

Proposal layout.pdf

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

sberlow commented 6 years ago

Please review the proposal content selected in this sheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lZcLW7xo39zG3TTv6EK3iLs5t8OjWWPJv0lb9qEnsDE/edit#gid=68394392

I added paraweight and parawidth

sberlow commented 6 years ago

@dberlow Would you like pwgt and pwth to be included in this version of the proposal which includes: Parametric -xtra -xopq -ytra -yopq -ytlc -ytuc -ytde -ytas

or have 2 versions of the proposal? Parametric 1.0 and Composite 1.0 pwth pwgt grad

either way is fine

dberlow commented 6 years ago

If none of them and been proposed yet then whatever the initial one is the one I mean?

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 2, 2017, at 11:00 AM, Sam Berlow notifications@github.com wrote:

@dberlow Would you like pwgt and pwth to be included in this version of the proposal which includes: Parametric -xtra -xopq -ytra -yopq -ytlc -ytuc -ytde -ytas

or have 2 versions of the proposal? Parametric 1.0 and Composite 1.0 pwth pwgt grad

either way is fine

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

ghost commented 6 years ago

I think it makes most sense to separate them.

ghost commented 6 years ago

I'm wondering if we shouldn't separate it into three proposals:

dberlow commented 6 years ago

I was responding to THIS LINK.

Please review the proposal content selected in this sheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lZcLW7xo39zG3TTv6EK3iLs5t8OjW WPJv0lb9qEnsDE/edit#gid=68394392

And at that Link to the Tab Titled, "PRIMARY AXIS PROPOSAL"

I Said,

  1. Add pwth pwgt

  2. Sam asked, "add them to which proposal?"!?

I repeat — This one:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lZcLW7xo39zG3TTv6EK3iLs5t8OjW WPJv0lb9qEnsDE/edit#gid=68394392 to the Tab Titled, "PRIMARY AXIS PROPOSAL"

  1. Don't add any axes flags info as "hidden", or "parametric".

You have until the end of monday to do this.

  1. if it it does not happen by 5:00 p.m. est, then stop working on this entirely and don't worry about the databases or sites again.
  2. if it is published, then stop working on this any more and you don't worry about the databases or sites again.

Thanks.

Thanks.

On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Sam Berlow notifications@github.com wrote:

No

On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 6:02 PM Chris Lewis notifications@github.com wrote:

I'm wondering if we shouldn't separate it into three proposals:

  • axes modifying the existing OS/2 values (cap height, x height, ascender, descender)
  • parametric axes
  • composite axes

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/TypeNetwork/Opentype-1.8-Axis-Proposal/issues/48# issuecomment-348726689, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ AHWxs4HetOIFcsQMvIC3G27AVlEjrt5Oks5s8dcGgaJpZM4QyvRt .

-- Sam Berlow General Manager Font Bureau 151 Beach Road https://maps.google.com/?q=151+Beach+Road+%0D+Tisbury,+Ma.+02568&entry=gmail&source=g Tisbury, Ma. 02568

508-693-2425 <(508)%20693-2425>

www.fontbureau.com

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/TypeNetwork/Opentype-1.8-Axis-Proposal/issues/48#issuecomment-348734931, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB3ajlXQP9SttYH7ZEFs93BfXfLYfc1Wks5s8gPrgaJpZM4QyvRt .

sberlow commented 6 years ago

@dberlow

1. Axes were added pwth pwgt grad (should this be included?)

2. Axes Flags This proposal was drafted based on the instructions from Microsoft.

https://github.com/TypeNetwork/Opentype-1.8-Axis-Proposal/blob/Microsoft-Proposal/ProposalSummary.md

'Axes Type' is one of the categories on the proposal. They give an option of Parametric or Optical.

Shall I leave this blank?

We have not referred to hidden or unhidden.

Working Sheet