search

FooBarWidget / mizuho

Documentation formatting tool. Converts Asciidoc input into nicely formatted HTML.
https://github.com/FooBarWidget/mizuho
MIT License
71 stars 7 forks source link

Test failure with mizuho 0.9.19 #5

Closed graaff closed 11 years ago

graaff commented 11 years ago

I'm trying to package this for Gentoo Linux since this is a new dependency for passenger 4.x, and I'm seeing the following test failure. Indeed, no parser.rb file is to be found. Are the test outdated, or am I missing something in the build process?

/usr/bin/ruby19 -S spec -f s -c test/*_spec.rb
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.3.2/lib/spec/runner/options.rb:188: Use RbConfig instead of obsolete and deprecated Config.
/usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:45:in `require': cannot load such file -- mizuho/parser (LoadError)
    from /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:45:in `require'
    from test/generator_spec.rb:2:in `<top (required)>'
    from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.3.2/lib/spec/runner/example_group_runner.rb:15:in `load'
    from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.3.2/lib/spec/runner/example_group_runner.rb:15:in `block in load_files'
    from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.3.2/lib/spec/runner/example_group_runner.rb:14:in `each'
    from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.3.2/lib/spec/runner/example_group_runner.rb:14:in `load_files'
    from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.3.2/lib/spec/runner/options.rb:134:in `run_examples'
    from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.3.2/lib/spec/runner/command_line.rb:9:in `run'
    from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.3.2/bin/spec:5:in `<top (required)>'
    from /usr/bin/spec:8:in `load'
    from /usr/bin/spec:8:in `<main>'
FooBarWidget commented 11 years ago

The tests aren't complete, so it's normal that they fail. Don't worry about that.

FooBarWidget commented 11 years ago

As for Gentoo packaging: we also publish tarballs that already have the documentation HTML precompiled, and so don't need mizuho. The Debian packages are built from the tarballs. Would that help you?

graaff commented 10 years ago

Thanks for the feedback. We were using the tagged tarball from github up to now, but it's easy to switch to the released tarball instead. Note that the fakeroot task still tries to rebuild documentation, so I had to remove that dependency for now.

FooBarWidget commented 10 years ago

That's a problem with timestamps. In the Debian build scripts we touch doc/*.html to prevent the build system from trying to rebuild the documentation.

On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Hans de Graaff notifications@github.comwrote:

Thanks for the feedback. We were using the tagged tarball from github up to now, but it's easy to switch to the released tarball instead. Note that the fakeroot task still tries to rebuild documentation, so I had to remove that dependency for now.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/FooBarWidget/mizuho/issues/5#issuecomment-21306587 .