cburstedde
commented
2 years ago I'm noticing that we multiply (s->mx + 1) * (s->my + 1) + (s->mx + 1). Do we need mz at least once?
Edit: no, seems fine.
Closed cburstedde closed 2 years ago
cburstedde
commented
2 years ago I'm noticing that we multiply (s->mx + 1) * (s->my + 1) + (s->mx + 1). Do we need mz at least once?
Edit: no, seems fine.
Three data fields need to be written using 64 bit integers if the .vtu file becomes large. This has been forseen in the past and caught with SC_ABORT_NOT_REACHED. This PR adds this functionality, namely for connectivity, offset, and patchno. Please give it some testing.