Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
There have been bug fixes related to repetition between those two versions.
Although regex 0.1.20110315 gives the correct results for this pattern and
text, it gives incorrect results for certain other patterns and texts.
For this text I find that regex 0.1.20120613 is between 1.5 and 2 times faster
than re with Python 3.2, gives the same results as re whether matching Unicode
or ASCII, and that the times scale as expected for the number of iterations, so
the time per iteration remains about the same.
Original comment by re...@mrabarnett.plus.com
on 2 Jul 2012 at 4:00
You might be interested to know that performance improvements in regex
0.1.20121031 have now made this particular test about 15 times faster than re
with Python 3.2.
Original comment by re...@mrabarnett.plus.com
on 31 Oct 2012 at 3:48
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
klizhen...@gmail.com
on 2 Jul 2012 at 12:23