Closed adamesque closed 6 years ago
Merging #226 into master will increase coverage by
0.02%
. The diff coverage is100%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #226 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 98.87% 98.89% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 19 20 +1
Lines 266 271 +5
==========================================
+ Hits 263 268 +5
Misses 3 3
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/util/merge-queries.js | 100% <100%> (ø) |
|
src/components/link.js | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/reducer.js | 100% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/middleware.js | 95.83% <100%> (+0.59%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 724b348...2637111. Read the comment docs.
any updates on this PR?
@PeterLeeHyfn I've been happily using my fork with this fix. This project appears to be dormant right now; seems like it's maintained by a single person & I don't begrudge them taking a break; open source takes an incredible amount of energy. If I had the bandwidth I'd offer to help maintain, but I can't really make that offer in good faith right now.
Hi @adamesque !
This one is a priority of ours and we're aiming to get back to the backlog soon. Biggest blocker is a small child cramping our main maintainer's style + we haven't been able to train up some other folks to better help maintain the repo.
It's on the radar, just not right now. Totally understand needing to get by with a fork in the meantime, and appreciate any patience y'all have for us as we try and get more support ❤️ going for this repo....
Thanks for the review, @aweary! I pushed up a few commits to address your feedback.
It would be great if we could get this pull request merged and published soon. It's really needed.
@yogaboll -- I think we have just one more test request from @adamesque to go. If you want to pull this branch, create a test and just paste it here in a comment, we might able to go forward if @adamesque doesn't have time right now.
@ryan-roemer looks like that test was added (Github just didn't collapse my comment). @tptee if this looks good to you then it should be good to merge 👍
Out in v14.2.2
!
This PR adds awareness of
persistQuery
to the middleware, so that when we push/replace a new history state, the browser's URL includes the merged set of query params.It also adds a new utility function,
mergeQueries
, which takes two query objects, merges them, and return aLocation
-compatible object with the merged queries and a mergedsearch
string.Let me know what you think!
Fixes #224