Closed lsoucasse closed 6 months ago
Thanks, I do think that fwl-
ultimately makes sense and is economical. This gives us in the future the option to have less headache with naming choice even for more common names or acronyms. So fwl-proteus
, fwl-janus
, fwl-mors
and so on.
Ah, and I think it should be fwl
, as fw
seems inadvisable as an acronym. 🙃
I agree that the fwl-
prefix makes sense. Can we claim these names now, without configuring the PyPi projects beyond that?
I am afraid we cannot reserve the names unless we upload now empty dump ones we complete later. But it seems unlikely that someone will create a fwl-proteus package?
We agreed on the naming so I just close this issue.
Proteus, janus or mors are already names for other PyPI packages. We need to think of a name extension that links to the group or the field of planetary modelling, for instance proteus-kapteyn or proteus-formingworlds.